- name
- maintain-storybook
- description
- Keep Paperclip stories and their downstream catalog aligned with the feature map and production UI. Use to reconcile story drift, classify prototypes, update fixtures, or maintain feature coverage.
Maintain Storybook
Read the Storybook catalog contract,
the relevant feature recipes, and
DESIGN.md. The feature map is an upstream input. This skill
owns stories, their fixtures/support, and maps/storybook-map/; it does not edit
the feature or agent-access maps. Report upstream drift to
maintain-verification-skill with source evidence.
Reconcile the requested scope
For a feature/change, follow its capability IDs to catalog entries and shared
dependencies. For a full inventory, account for every configured story file,
including historical examples. Start with node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs.
Record the source revision and whether the pass covers source, rendering,
interactions, or visual comparisons. Inventory completeness is not behavioral
coverage. Do not expand a targeted maintenance request into an all-product audit.
Compare each affected story's rendered subject, props, fixture responses, actions, and assertions with the production implementation and recipe. Follow imported wrappers: a production Button inside a locally recreated page does not make that page a production-component story. A real production page using mocked APIs is valid isolation; record component provenance and data simulation separately. Inspect mock methods/paths, payload shapes, errors, identity, gates, and reset behavior. An API method returning success without the relevant state transition can hide drift. Do not replace errors with generic successful mocks to pass.
Prefer mounting the shipped subject and mocking its external boundary. Retain local layout wrappers and fixture data when they serve that isolation. Replace a duplicate product implementation only when the current component expresses the same scenario without losing the original purpose. Production bugs and larger redesigns are separate findings, not reasons to rewrite expected behavior.
Classify current examples, proposals, historical explorations, and unresolved
cases explicitly. Use unreviewed when evidence does not establish parity.
Retain useful superseded work with its rationale and replacement reference;
do not delete a story merely because it is old, mocked, or duplicated by name.
Record mixed suites honestly and split them only when that improves review.