Download .skills/wiki-update/SKILL.md from the publisher, or copy the path and open the repository. PlugMCP lists the skill and does not host the file.
Where does wiki-update live?
The publisher keeps it at https://github.com/Ar9av/obsidian-wiki.
Which agents can use wiki-update?
Claude, Cursor, and Codex can read a SKILL.md you add from the publisher's repository.
>
name: wiki-update
description: >
Sync knowledge from the current project into the Obsidian wiki. Use when work already in the current project should be distilled into the vault; named-vault routing includes @work update wiki. wiki-capture saves the current conversation and wiki-ingest handles external/new sources.
Wiki Update — Sync Any Project to Your Wiki
You are distilling knowledge from the current project into the user's Obsidian wiki. This skill works from any project directory, not just the obsidian-wiki repo.
Before You Start
Writing profile: Before drafting or rewriting natural-language Markdown, read and apply the Writing Profile Resolution section in llm-wiki/SKILL.md. Framework schema, provenance, safety, and operation-specific requirements take precedence.
WRITING.md preferences apply only to newly drafted or rewritten natural-language Markdown; preserve source content and structured records.
Resolve config — follow the Config Resolution Protocol in llm-wiki/SKILL.md (inline @name override → walk up CWD for .env → global config → prompt setup). This gives OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH, OBSIDIAN_WIKI_REPO, OBSIDIAN_LINK_FORMAT (wikilink default or markdown), and optional QMD settings such as QMD_WIKI_COLLECTION. Works from any project directory.
Read $OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH/.manifest.json to check if this project has been synced before.
Read $OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH/index.md to know what the wiki already contains.
When writing internal links in Steps 4–5, apply the link format from llm-wiki/SKILL.md (Link Format section) using the OBSIDIAN_LINK_FORMAT value.
Step 1: Understand the Project
Figure out what this project is by scanning the current working directory:
package.json, pyproject.toml, go.mod, Cargo.toml or whatever defines the project
Git log (focus on commit messages that signal decisions, not "fix typo" stuff)
Claude memory files if they exist (.claude/ in the project)
Derive a clean project name from the directory name.
Step 2: Compute the Delta
Check .manifest.json for this project:
First time? Full scan. Everything is new.
Synced before? Look at last_commit_synced. Before computing the delta, verify the stored SHA is still reachable:
git merge-base --is-ancestor <last_commit_synced> HEAD
Exit 0 (ancestor): Safe. Run git log <last_commit_synced>..HEAD --oneline to see what changed.
Exit 1 (not an ancestor — rebase or force-push occurred): The stored SHA is no longer in this branch's history. Warn the user: "Stored commit <sha> is no longer reachable — branch may have been rebased or force-pushed. Falling back to full scan." Then treat as first-time sync: re-scan everything and update last_commit_synced to the current HEAD SHA at the end of Step 6.
If nothing meaningful changed since last sync, tell the user and stop.
Step 3: Decide What to Distill
This is the core question from Karpathy's pattern: what would you want to know about this project if you came back in 3 months with zero context?
Worth distilling:
Architecture decisions and why they were made
Patterns discovered while building (things you'd Google again otherwise)
What tools, services, APIs the project depends on and how they're wired together
Key abstractions, how they connect, what the mental model is
Trade-offs that were evaluated, what was picked and why
Things learned while building that aren't obvious from reading the code
Not worth distilling:
File listings, boilerplate, config that's obvious
Individual bug fixes with no broader lesson
Dependency versions, lock file contents
Implementation details the code already says clearly
Routine changes anyone could read from the diff
The heuristic: if reading the codebase answers the question, don't wiki it. If you'd have to re-derive the reasoning by reading git blame across 20 commits, wiki it.
Step 3b: Build a code-understanding focus map (optional)
GUARD: If the obsidian-wiki code-understand command fails or is unavailable, skip this step and continue — it is an optimisation, not a requirement.
When this project contains code, run the local code-understanding extractor before distilling. It parses the codebase locally and returns a focus map — the ranked files and symbols the architecture hangs on — so you read the load-bearing parts instead of scanning everything.
Read the output selectively — when backend: codegraph, treat focus-map entries as structural facts with file:line citations; when backend: builtin, treat defines/imports entries as facts but treat rg-reference entries as weaker evidence — open the file and verify before citing. Open only the ranked files/file:lines the focus map points at; never paste the JSON into the wiki or the vault.
Cite the evidence — every architectural claim written to a page references its evidence as (file:lines) from the focus map or from the opened source; keep using the existing provenance markers.
Prune stale relationships (required) — when updating an existing projects/<name>/ page, cross-check each previously recorded code relationship against the current focus map (or obsidian-wiki ast-extract for a symbol-level recheck). Remove relationships whose target symbol no longer exists or is no longer reachable; update the page and record the removals in log.md. This keeps false positives from accumulating.
Never write .codegraph/ or the code-understand JSON into $OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH — the graph is a cache/sidecar in the project repo, not wiki knowledge.
Offer CodeGraph when it's missing (optional) — if the output reports backend: builtin because codegraph is unavailable and the user wants the enhanced backend, offer to install it for them: npm install -g @colbymchenry/codegraph (or set CODE_UNDERSTANDING_CODEGRAPH_BIN to an existing binary), then re-run this step so the focus map uses the graph. Never install without the user's go-ahead, and never let a missing codegraph block the sync.
If obsidian-wiki is not installed or the command fails, skip this step and proceed to Step 4 as normal — it is an optimisation, not a requirement.
Step 4: Distill into Wiki Pages
Project-specific knowledge
Goes under $VAULT/projects/<project-name>/:
projects/<project-name>/
├── <project-name>.md ← project overview (named after the project, NOT _project.md)
├── concepts/ ← project-specific ideas, architectures
├── skills/ ← project-specific how-tos, patterns
└── references/ ← project-specific source summaries
The overview page (<project-name>.md) should have:
What the project is (one paragraph)
Key concepts and how they connect
Links to project-specific and global wiki pages
Global knowledge
Things that aren't project-specific go in the global categories:
What you found
Where it goes
A general concept learned
concepts/
A reusable pattern or technique
skills/
A tool/service/person
entities/
Cross-project analysis
synthesis/
Page format
Every page needs YAML frontmatter:
---
title: >-
Page Title
category: concepts
tags: [tag1, tag2]
sources: [projects/<project-name>]
summary: >-
One or two sentences (≤200 chars) describing what this page covers.
provenance:
extracted: 0.6
inferred: 0.35
ambiguous: 0.05
base_confidence: 0.59
lifecycle: draft
lifecycle_changed: TIMESTAMP_DATE
created: TIMESTAMP
updated: TIMESTAMP
---
Use folded scalar syntax (summary: >-) for title and summary to keep frontmatter parser-safe across punctuation (:, #, quotes) without escaping rules.
Keep the title and summary contents indented by two spaces under summary: >-.
# Page Title
- A fact the codebase or a doc actually states.
- A reason the design works this way. ^[inferred]
Use [[wikilinks]] to connect to other pages.
Write a summary: frontmatter field on every new/updated page (1–2 sentences, ≤200 chars), using >- folded style. For project sync, a good summary answers "what does this page tell me about the project I wouldn't guess from its title?" This field powers cheap retrieval by wiki-query.
Apply provenance markers per llm-wiki (Provenance Markers section). For project sync specifically:
Extracted — anything visible in the code, config, or a doc/commit message: file structure, dependencies, function signatures, what a file does.
Inferred — why a decision was made, design rationale, trade-offs, "the team chose X because Y" — unless a commit message, doc, or ADR states it explicitly.
Ambiguous — when the code and docs disagree, or when there's clearly an in-progress migration with two patterns living side by side.
Compute the rough fractions and write the provenance: block on every new/updated page.
Updating vs creating
If a page already exists in the vault, merge new information into it. Don't create duplicates.
If you're adding to an existing page, update the updated timestamp and add the new source.
Check index.md to see what's already there before creating anything new.
Step 5: Cross-link
After creating/updating pages:
Add [[wikilinks]] from new pages to existing related pages
Add [[wikilinks]] from existing pages back to the new ones where relevant
Link the project overview to all project-specific pages and relevant global pages
Step 6: Update Tracking
Update .manifest.json
Add or update this project's entry. The project identity must be portable across machines: record the repository URL in source_repo (from git remote get-url origin, normalised to host/owner/name), and only an optional source_cwd_hint for where this machine happens to have it checked out. Never write a machine absolute path — see llm-wiki/SKILL.md → .manifest.json (Source key contract v2).
If the project is not a git repository, use a repo:<stable-name> pseudo-key for source_repo and keep source_cwd_hint as the only location field.
Update index.md
Add entries for any new pages created.
Update index.md, log.md, and hot.md
One locked call, not three hand edits:
obsidian-wiki memory sync WIKI_UPDATE project=<project-name> \
pages_created=X pages_updated=Y \
source_repo=github.com/owner/<project-name> \
--takeaways "Synced obsidian-wiki — wiki-capture and wiki-research added; the new capabilities are autonomous web research and conversation capture."
--takeaways should carry the most important architectural insight or decision
surfaced during this sync, written conceptually rather than as a file list. Omit
it to leave the previous takeaways untouched.
If this project is an ongoing focus, record the thread so the next session picks
it up:
obsidian-wiki memory todo add "<the open thread>" --origin projects/<project-name>.md
See .skills/llm-wiki/references/MEMORY.md for the full procedure.
Step 7: Refresh QMD Wiki Index (optional — requires QMD_WIKI_COLLECTION)
GUARD: If $QMD_WIKI_COLLECTION is empty or unset, skip this step. The markdown vault is the source of truth; QMD is only a search index.
Run this step only after pages, .manifest.json, index.md, log.md, and hot.md have been written. If Step 2 found no meaningful changes and the sync stopped early, do not refresh QMD.
This refresh currently requires the local QMD CLI. Use $QMD_CLI if set; otherwise use qmd. If the CLI is unavailable or returns an error, do not roll back the wiki update; report that the wiki was updated but QMD refresh was skipped or failed.
For CLI refresh:
${QMD_CLI:-qmd} update
If the output says new hashes need vectors, or if pages were created/updated and embeddings may be stale, run:
${QMD_CLI:-qmd} embed
Verify at least one created or materially updated page is visible in the wiki collection:
${QMD_CLI:-qmd} get "qmd://$QMD_WIKI_COLLECTION/projects/<project-name>/<page>.md" -l 5
If the exact qmd:// path is uncertain, use:
${QMD_CLI:-qmd} ls "$QMD_WIKI_COLLECTION" | rg "<project-name>"
Record QMD refresh in the final report as one of:
QMD refreshed: update + embed + verified
QMD skipped: QMD_WIKI_COLLECTION unset
QMD skipped: qmd CLI unavailable
QMD failed: <short error summary>
Tips
Be aggressive about merging. If the project uses React Server Components, don't create a new page if concepts/react-server-components.md already exists. Update the existing one and add this project as a source.
Consult the tag taxonomy. Read $VAULT/_meta/taxonomy.md if it exists, and use canonical tags.
Don't copy code. Distill the knowledge, not the implementation. "This project uses a debounced search pattern with 300ms delay" is useful. Pasting the actual debounce function is not.
Project overview is the anchor. The <project-name>.md file is what you'd read to get oriented. Make it good.
How do I install wiki-update?
Download .skills/wiki-update/SKILL.md from the publisher, or copy the path and open the repository. PlugMCP lists the skill and does not host the file.
Where does wiki-update live?
The publisher keeps it at https://github.com/Ar9av/obsidian-wiki.
Which agents can use wiki-update?
Claude, Cursor, and Codex can read a SKILL.md you add from the publisher's repository.