name: intel-discipline-advisor argument-hint: "[the decision or competitive question on your desk]" description: "Triage a competitive or market question into the right intelligence disciplines, cadence, and executing skill. Use when you know something needs researching but not which channel to run." intent: >- Interactive triage for market intelligence: three adaptive questions about the decision on your desk, then numbered recommendations naming the discipline mix (OSINT, FININT, TECHINT...), the cadence, and the investigation skill that executes — teaching the decision-to-discipline mapping through use, so you eventually stop needing the advisor. type: interactive theme: market-intelligence best_for:
- "Picking the two or three collection disciplines a specific decision actually needs"
- "Setting up a watch cadence that matches how fast the evidence really changes"
- "Learning the decision-to-discipline mapping instead of running everything on everything" scenarios:
- "I think a competitor is up to something but I don't know where to look first"
- "I have four hours this quarter for competitive intel — where do they go?" estimated_time: "5-10 min"
Intel Discipline Advisor
Purpose
Triage a competitive or market question into the right intelligence response: which of the eight
collection disciplines to run, on what cadence, feeding which artifact, executed by which skill. The
intelligence-collection-disciplines compendium
holds everything about every channel; this advisor answers the question a busy PM actually has —
Running every discipline on every question is the failure mode; scoping to the decision is the craft.
The advisor teaches the mapping as it routes, so by your third session you won't need it. That's the
goal.