Loading
Prepare and execute negotiations using tactical empathy, calibrated questions, and the Ackerman method. Use when the user mentions "salary negotiation", "contract terms", "handling objections", "mirro
The skill file stays in the publisher's repository.
Paste the copied command in a terminal. It installs this SKILL.md into that agent.
npx skills add wondelai/skills --skill negotiation -a cursor -y
Prepare and execute negotiations using tactical empathy, calibrated questions, and the Ackerman method. Use when the user mentions "salary negotiation", "contract terms", "handling objections", "mirroring and labeling", "difficult conversation", "deal terms", "BATNA", "anchoring", "how do I ask for a raise", "get a better deal", or "they wont budge on price". Also trigger when preparing for a vendor negotiation, resolving a pricing dispute, or navigating a high-stakes conversation where both sides need to feel heard. Covers accusation audits, Black Swan discovery, and the "Thats Right" technique. For persuasion in product and marketing, see influence-psychology.
Prepare and execute negotiations using tactical empathy, calibrated questions, and the Ackerman method. Use when the user mentions "salary negotiation", "contract terms", "handling objections", "mirroring and labeling", "difficult conversation", "deal terms", "BATNA", "anchoring", "how do I ask for a raise", "get a better deal", or "they wont budge on price". Also trigger when preparing for a vendor negotiation, resolving a pricing dispute, or navigating a high-stakes conversation where both sides need to feel heard. Covers accusation audits, Black Swan discovery, and the "Thats Right" technique. For persuasion in product and marketing, see influence-psychology.
Tactical empathy-based negotiation framework from FBI hostage negotiator Chris Voss. Understand the emotional drivers behind decisions and use proven techniques to build rapport, uncover hidden information, and reach better outcomes.
People want to be understood and feel safe. The most effective path to "yes" runs through empathy, active listening, and emotional intelligence -- not logic, arguments, or compromise. Treat every negotiation as a discovery process: your assumptions are hypotheses to test, and the other side's needs (respect, security, autonomy) matter more than their stated positions. Never split the difference -- no deal is better than a bad deal.
Goal: 10/10. Score 1 point per satisfied Quick Diagnostic row (6 rows), plus up to 4 points for execution quality: emotions labeled out loud (+1), "That's right" earned not "You're right" (+1), no "Why?" / no splitting the difference / no chasing "yes" (+1), at least one Black Swan surfaced (+1). Bands: 9-10 = audit delivered, calibrated questions and BATNA prepared, "That's right" achieved, Black Swans hunted; 5-6 = some prep but arguing the position or chasing "yes"; <=3 = no audit, no BATNA, splitting the difference. Always state the current score and the specific gaps to reach 10/10.
Core concept: Consciously imagine yourself in the counterpart's situation, then vocalize their perspective to create trust and openness.
Why it works: When people feel understood, brain chemistry shifts toward trust and cooperation, short-circuiting defensive reactions. Empathy is not agreement -- you can understand their position while advocating your own.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Customer support | Acknowledge frustration before solving | "I understand this outage is affecting your team's deadline" |
| Sales calls | Voice the prospect's pressures | "It sounds like you're under pressure to show results this quarter" |
| Pricing conversations | Acknowledge budget constraints upfront | "I know adding another tool to the stack feels risky right now" |
Copy patterns:
See references/techniques.md for the full 21-technique reference -- each section below points to the part you need at the moment you need it. Open it now for The Power of Apology and Pause, which has no section here.
Core concept: Repeat the last 1-3 critical words your counterpart said, with a curious, upward-inflecting tone, then go silent.
Why it works: Mirroring signals deep listening, creating familiarity and rapport. It prompts elaboration without direct questions, revealing more than the counterpart intended to share.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery calls | Mirror key concerns to get elaboration | Client: "The timeline is tight." You: "The timeline is tight?" |
| User interviews | Encourage deeper explanation of pain | User: "It's just frustrating." You: "Frustrating?" |
| Objection handling | Reflect to find the root cause | "Doesn't fit your budget?" |
Copy patterns:
Core concept: Identify and verbalize the counterpart's emotions or perspective using neutral phrases: "It seems like...", "It sounds like...", "It looks like..."
Why it works: Naming emotions validates them -- labeling negative emotions diffuses their power, labeling positive emotions reinforces them. The tentative phrasing gives room to correct you, which deepens the conversation either way.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Customer complaints | Name the frustration before solving | "It sounds like you feel let down by our response time" |
| Sales objections | Label the underlying concern | "It seems like there's a concern about implementation risk" |
| Churn prevention | Identify the real reason for leaving | "It sounds like something changed since you first signed up" |
Copy patterns:
Core concept: Open-ended "How...?" and "What...?" questions that shape the conversation while giving the counterpart the illusion of control.
Why it works: Calibrated questions engage the counterpart's problem-solving mind, making them feel in charge while you steer. They force the other side to consider your position without you stating it, and avoid the defensiveness "Why?" creates.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Price negotiation | Push back without refusing | "How am I supposed to do that at that price point?" |
| Scope creep | Make them own the constraint | "What happens to the timeline if we add this?" |
| Stakeholder alignment | Uncover hidden decision-makers | "How does your team typically make decisions like this?" |
Copy patterns:
For No-oriented questions ("Would it be unreasonable to...?") and tactical mislabeling to draw out a corrective "No", see techniques.md section 8 when a counterpart is guarded or stalling.
Core concept: Before negotiating, list and preemptively verbalize every negative thing the counterpart might think or say about you.
Why it works: Naming fears and criticisms before the other side does removes their power -- it often triggers reassurance ("Oh, I don't think that...") and at minimum neutralizes objections. Addressing the elephants first demonstrates self-awareness and builds trust.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Price increase announcement | Preempt anger before explaining | "You're probably thinking we don't value your loyalty..." |
| Sales cold outreach | Acknowledge the intrusion | "I know you're busy and the last thing you want is another sales pitch..." |
| Service failure recovery | Own the failure fully | "You're probably furious, and you have every right to be..." |
Copy patterns:
Core concept: Summarize the counterpart's position -- facts, emotions, and concerns -- so accurately that they respond with "That's right." This is the breakthrough moment in any negotiation.
Why it works: "That's right" signals the person feels completely understood, shifting their mindset from adversarial to collaborative. It is fundamentally different from "You're right," which usually means they're dismissing you.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Sales closing | Summarize their needs before proposing | "So your team needs X, you're worried about Y, and Z is the deal-breaker..." |
| Customer retention | Show you understand why they're leaving | "Let me make sure I have this: the product isn't delivering on the promise we made..." |
| Negotiation closure | Confirm understanding before terms | "Let me make sure I understand: you need [X], by [date], and [constraint]..." |
Copy patterns:
For the three types of Yes (counterfeit, confirmation, commitment) and the Rule of Three confirmation sequence, see techniques.md sections 10-11 when closing or locking in a commitment.
Core concept: A systematic monetary negotiation method: calculated offers in decreasing increments (65% -> 85% -> 95% -> 100% of target) with precise non-round numbers and a non-monetary bonus at the end.
Why it works: Decreasing increments signal you're approaching your limit, and precise numbers ($47,235 vs $47,000) feel calculated and final. The closing non-monetary gift signals generosity at the limit, making it psychologically harder to ask for more.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Salary negotiation | Structure counter-offers systematically | Target $120K: open at $78K, move to $102K, $114K, final $120,350 + extra PTO |
| Vendor pricing | Methodical price reduction | Target $50K: start $32.5K, move to $42.5K, $47.5K, final $49,850 + extended payment terms |
| SaaS enterprise deals | Multi-year pricing negotiations | Decreasing discount increments across contract years |
Copy patterns:
For setting the opening anchor, soft range-anchoring, and framing loss aversion, see techniques.md section 14 before you name the first number.
Core concept: Hidden, game-changing pieces of information that transform a negotiation once discovered. Every negotiation has approximately three lurking.
Why it works: Negotiations stall or fail when critical information stays hidden. Black Swans -- the unknown unknowns -- explain seemingly irrational behavior, and discovering even one can turn a stalemate into a breakthrough.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise sales | Discover hidden budget or timeline constraints | "What happens internally if this doesn't get resolved by Q3?" |
| Churn analysis | Uncover the real cancellation reason | "It seems like something changed -- what happened?" |
| Hiring negotiations | Discover the candidate's true priorities | "What would make you regret not taking this offer?" |
Copy patterns:
For applying the three leverage types, reading pronoun shifts that reveal who really decides, and using dynamic silence to draw out hidden information, see techniques.md sections 16, 20, and 21 when a negotiation stalls or you suspect a hidden decision-maker.
| Style | Signs | Adapt by... |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst | Methodical, data-driven, hates surprises | Use facts, be patient, don't rush |
| Accommodator | Friendly, relationship-focused, avoids conflict | Build rapport, but pin down specifics |
| Assertive | Direct, time-conscious, wants to win | Be efficient, stand firm, acknowledge their points |
Insight: Great negotiators borrow from all three styles as needed.
See techniques.md sections 4 and 19 when you need the full Late-Night DJ Voice mechanics and the cues to read in their body language.
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Splitting the difference | Lukewarm outcomes nobody is happy with | Hold firm; no deal is better than a bad deal |
| Pushing for "yes" | Makes people defensive; produces counterfeit agreement | Pursue "That's right"; let them say "No" first |
| Arguing your position | Triggers resistance and shuts down listening | Use calibrated questions and labels to let them talk |
| Skipping the accusation audit | Unaddressed objections fester and derail later | List every negative they might think; address early |
| Countering an extreme anchor immediately | Validates their anchor as the starting point | Mirror, label, ask "How did you arrive at that?" |
| Using "Why?" | Sounds accusatory and triggers defensiveness | Replace with "What" and "How" questions |
| Treating "You're right" as success | It means they want you to go away | Keep working toward "That's right" |
| Question | If No | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Have I prepared an accusation audit? | Objections will blindside you | List every negative they might think; address early |
| Do I have 3-5 calibrated questions ready? | You'll default to arguing | Draft "How" and "What" questions targeting their needs |
| Have I identified my BATNA? | You'll accept a bad deal under pressure | Define your walk-away point before negotiating |
| Am I aiming for "That's right"? | You'll chase counterfeit "yes" | Summarize their position until they affirm genuinely |
| Have I considered their negotiation style? | One-size-fits-all will misfire | Assess if they're Analyst, Accommodator, or Assertive |
| Am I hunting for Black Swans? | You'll miss game-changing information | Stay curious; watch for anomalies; ask about the unexpected |
Based on Chris Voss's experience as an FBI hostage negotiator:
Chris Voss is a former FBI lead international kidnapping negotiator who worked over 150 hostage situations in a 24-year career, and the founder of the Black Swan Group, which trains businesses in tactical negotiation. He has taught at Harvard Law School, Georgetown, and MIT Sloan; Never Split the Difference is one of the most widely recommended business books in the world.