ArcKit: The Enterprise Architecture Governance Harness
Build better enterprise architecture through structured strategy, design, delivery, and assurance workflows.
ArcKit is a toolkit for enterprise architects that transforms architecture governance from scattered documents into a systematic, AI-assisted workflow for:
- 🏛️ Establishing and enforcing architecture principles
- 👥 Analyzing stakeholder drivers, goals, and outcomes
- 🛡️ Risk management (HM Treasury Orange Book)
- 💼 Business case justification (HM Treasury Green Book SOBC)
- 📋 Creating comprehensive requirements documents
- 🗄️ Data modeling with ERD, GDPR compliance, and data governance
- 🔬 Technology research with build vs buy analysis (web search powered)
- ☁️ Azure-specific research using Microsoft Learn MCP for authoritative documentation
- 🗺️ Strategic planning with Wardley Mapping
- 📊 Generating visual architecture diagrams (Mermaid)
- 🤝 Managing vendor RFP and selection processes
- ✅ Conducting formal design reviews (HLD/DLD)
- 🔧 ServiceNow service management design
- 🔗 Maintaining requirements traceability
- 📎 Citation traceability for external documents (inline
[DOC-CN]markers with source quotes)
ArcKit produces DRAFT artefacts for qualified people to review, not legal, regulatory, clinical, or security advice. See What ArcKit does not do.
Watch first
New to ArcKit, or explaining it to someone who doesn't use a coding assistant? Start with a film:
- ArcKit explained: what ArcKit is and how it keeps AI-drafted architecture documents reviewable, in under eight minutes.
- ArcKit for Beginners: one fictional council project, followed from its architecture principles to the release decision. One hour, or four shorter parts.
- ArcKit commands: a film of about a minute and a half for each command: what it is for, when to run it and what it produces.
The ArcKit YouTube channel also has a playlist for each overlay. The narration is AI-generated and the films are experimental; tell us on Discord what to cover next.
Quick Start
Installation
Claude Code (premier experience) — install the ArcKit plugin (requires v2.1.287+):
First, make sure Claude Code is on the latest version:
claude install latest
Then in Claude Code:
/plugin marketplace add tractorjuice/arckit-claude
Then install from the Discover tab, or via CLI. The marketplace ships 17 plugins — install only the overlays you need:
# Core (76 commands — UK Government civilian + generic enterprise)
claude plugin install arckit@arckit-claude
# Core + UAE federal
claude plugin install arckit arckit-uae
# Broad overlay set (UK + UAE + FR + CA + EU + AT + AU + US + UK-NHS + UK-GCloud)
claude plugin install arckit arckit-{uae,fr,ca,eu,at,au,us,uk-nhs,uk-gcloud}
# Enterprise architecture and AI agent governance overlays
claude plugin install arckit arckit-togaf-adm arckit-agent-architecture
The standalone tractorjuice/arckit-claude marketplace hosts all Claude Code plugins: the arckit core plugin, regional overlays, sector overlays, the TOGAF ADM and AI agent architecture overlays, the arckit-fde tooling plugin, and the public-but-proprietary arckit-uk-gcloud supplier overlay. The 14 community plugins (arckit-uae, arckit-fr, arckit-ca, arckit-eu, arckit-at, arckit-au, arckit-au-energy, arckit-us, arckit-uk-finance, arckit-uk-nhs, arckit-uk-gcloud, arckit-togaf-adm, arckit-agent-architecture, arckit-oaa) require the arckit core plugin. arckit-au-energy (sector) additionally requires arckit-au (jurisdiction), which it composes — install with claude plugin install arckit arckit-au arckit-au-energy. arckit-uk-gcloud is a proprietary, Claude Code only supplier-side G-Cloud bid-authoring overlay — it is public for installation and inspection, but not MIT licensed and not distributed to the non-Claude extension formats. One tooling plugin — arckit-fde — is a lean, Claude Code only plugin with one command, /arckit-fde:create, that generates a brandable (white-label) Forward Deploy Engineering consulting website into docs/ (GitHub Pages ready), with UK Public Sector and Generic market presets; no dependencies, not converted to non-Claude formats, no governance doc-types.
The older tractorjuice/arc-kit marketplace remains available for compatibility, but new Claude Code installs should use tractorjuice/arckit-claude. Claude Code is the primary development platform for ArcKit and provides the most complete experience: all official commands, autonomous research agents, automation hooks, bundled MCP servers (AWS Knowledge, Microsoft Learn, Google Developer Knowledge, govreposcrape, uk-tenders), and automatic updates via the marketplace. See Why Claude Code? below.
Why v2.1.287? It adds Claude mods, which ArcKit uses to draw a status line above the prompt: how many projects and artefacts you have, how many are DRAFT, and how many reviews are overdue. It also fixes plugin SessionStart hooks not running in new cloud sessions, which skipped ArcKit's session set-up and version check there.
The floor also carries earlier releases ArcKit depends on:
Models
- v2.1.284 adds Claude Sonnet 5.5 (
claude-sonnet-5-5), the default Sonnet model on the Anthropic API, with 1M context; earlier clients cannot select it. Like Opus 5.5 it always thinks and defaults toeffort: medium, so ArcKit'seffort: maxcommands run atmaxon it.- v2.1.280 adds Claude Opus 5.5 (
claude-opus-5-5), the default Opus model. It always thinks, so ArcKit'seffort: maxcommands can no longer be quietly sent ashighby a session with thinking off, and the Effective Effort row in each artefact's Build Provenance is accurate.- v2.1.219 adds Claude Opus 5 (
claude-opus-5), with 1M context and fast mode, which earlier clients cannot select (superseded as the default by Opus 5.5).- v2.1.197 makes Claude Sonnet 5 the default, with native 1M context.
Security and permissions
- v2.1.251 stops the file tools (Read, Write, Edit) following a symlink swapped inside the working directory after the permission check, and makes Grep and Glob honour
Read()deny rules through a symlinked search path. That is the same class of bypass the v2.1.222–v2.1.224 fixes closed for Bash, and the class ArcKit'sfile-protectionandsecret-file-scannergates sit in front of.- v2.1.234 stops Claude Code's MCP diagnostics printing resolved secrets. ArcKit bundles two keyed MCP servers whose
${user_config.*}API keys sit in request headers. On a session with no keys configured those connections fail by design, so ArcKit routinely produces exactly the diagnostics this fixed.- v2.1.222 stops PreToolUse auto-allow hooks bypassing tool restrictions inside background agent tasks, which became load-bearing when v2.1.232 made subagent spawns background by default.
- v2.1.223 and v2.1.224 close Bash permission-check bypasses, a sandbox
denyRead/denyWritetrailing-slash bypass, and a bug where project paths over 200 characters resolved into another project's session directory. v2.1.224 also surfaces sandbox violation details in Bash results.- v2.1.172 fixes wildcard-domain
WebFetchrules (WebFetch(domain:*.gov.uk)) that never matched subdomains on earlier clients. That is the exact shape ArcKit recommends for confining research-agent traffic in OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE deployments.Effort and thinking
- v2.1.251 sends Opus 5
effort: xhigh/maxashighwhen thinking is off instead of failing, so ArcKit'seffort: maxcommands complete on thinking-off sessions.- v2.1.221 fixes
WebSearchreturning a 400 ateffort: xhigh/maxwhen thinking is disabled, which silently broke ArcKit'seffort: maxcommands and its three max-effort research agents for anyone running with thinking off.Plugin loading and agents
- v2.1.246 fixes four plugin-loading bugs that hit ArcKit's exact layout:
/reload-pluginscounted 0 skills for plugins that define skills underskills/*/SKILL.md, hook error messages showed a literal${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}instead of the resolved path, the plugin cache created duplicate SHA-named directories, andclaude plugin update <bare-name>failed.- v2.1.200 fixes project-scoped plugin loading from git worktrees and
claude agents --plugin-dir <dir>visibility, which makes ArcKit's branch and test-repo workflows reliable.- v2.1.198–v2.1.199 fix background-subagent reliability, parent error propagation and hook stderr visibility, which matter to
/arckit:build, reader/writer handoffs and hook diagnosis.Older fixes: v2.1.156 Opus 4.8 thinking-block fix, v2.1.154 plugin
defaultEnabled: false, v2.1.144 session-title and headless Skill tool fixes, v2.1.143 plugin dependency enforcement, v2.1.139 hookargs: string[], v2.1.129 monitor layout and prompt-cache fixes, v2.1.121 MCP/provenance hook unlocks, v2.1.118–v2.1.119 release/telemetry unlocks, and the earlier/context, Auto mode, plugin update, MCP leak, retry and subagent working-directory fixes.
Gemini CLI — install the ArcKit extension:
gemini extensions install https://github.com/tractorjuice/arckit-gemini
Zero-config: all 76 official commands, templates, scripts, and bundled MCP servers (AWS Knowledge, Microsoft Learn). Updates via gemini extensions update arckit.
GitHub Copilot (VS Code) — install the ArcKit CLI and scaffold prompt files:
# Install with pip
pip install git+https://github.com/tractorjuice/arc-kit.git
# Scaffold a project with Copilot prompt files
arckit init my-project --ai copilot
Creates .github/prompts/arckit-*.prompt.md (165 prompt files — the 76 official commands plus the community overlays), .github/agents/arckit-*.agent.md (10 custom agents), and .github/copilot-instructions.md (repo-wide context). Invoke commands in Copilot Chat as /arckit-requirements, /arckit-stakeholders, etc.
Codex CLI — install the ArcKit CLI:
# Install with pip
pip install git+https://github.com/tractorjuice/arc-kit.git
# Or with uv
uv tool install arckit-cli --from git+https://github.com/tractorjuice/arc-kit.git
# Or run without installing
uvx --from git+https://github.com/tractorjuice/arc-kit.git arckit init my-project
Mistral Vibe CLI — link the ArcKit extension:
# Clone the standalone extension repository
git clone https://github.com/tractorjuice/arckit-vibe.git
cd arckit-vibe
# Create extensions directory and link
mkdir -p ~/.vibe/extensions/
ln -s $(pwd) ~/.vibe/extensions/arckit
Zero-config: 76 official commands as skills, 10 specialized agents, all templates, and bundled MCP servers (AWS Knowledge, Microsoft Learn, Google Developer Knowledge, GovRepoScrape).
Kimi Code CLI — start kimi, then install the ArcKit plugin from the prompt:
/plugins install https://github.com/tractorjuice/arckit-kimi.git
Every ArcKit command ships as an Agent Skill, invoked with /skill:arckit-<command> (for example /skill:arckit-requirements). The kimi.plugin.json manifest carries all six bundled MCP servers and auto-loads the architecture-workflow skill at session start.
Latest Release: v6.18.3
OKF Interoperability
ArcKit can exchange Markdown knowledge bundles using an Open Knowledge Format-shaped frontmatter layer:
/arckit:export-okfcopies ArcKitARC-*.mdartifacts into an OKF bundle with portabletype,title,resource,tags,timestamp, andarckitmetadata./arckit:import-okfscans an OKF bundle, writes.arckit/tmp/okf-import-report.json, and materializes safe imports asRSCHreview notes by default.- Native ArcKit files remain unchanged unless you explicitly enable source frontmatter stamping with
ARCKIT_OKF_FRONTMATTER=1or.arckit/config.jsoncontaining{ "okfFrontmatter": true }.
Platform Support
Windows users: The Claude Code plugin, Gemini CLI extension, GitHub Copilot prompt files, Mistral Vibe extension, and Kimi Code CLI extension work natively on all platforms. For Codex CLI / OpenCode CLI on native Windows (without WSL), some commands containing inline bash snippets may require Git Bash or WSL2. We recommend WSL2 for the best experience.
Initialize a Project
Claude Code: No initialization needed — the plugin provides everything.
Mistral Vibe: No initialization needed — the extension provides everything.
Kimi Code CLI:
# Create a new architecture governance project
arckit init payment-modernization --ai kimi
# Or initialize in current directory
arckit init . --ai kimi
GitHub Copilot (VS Code):
# Create a new architecture governance project
arckit init payment-modernization --ai copilot
# Or initialize in current directory
arckit init . --ai copilot
OpenCode CLI:
# Create a new architecture governance project
arckit init payment-modernization --ai opencode
# Or initialize in current directory
arckit init . --ai opencode
Codex CLI:
# Create a new architecture governance project
arckit init payment-modernization --ai codex
# Minimal install (skip docs and guides)
arckit init payment-modernization --ai codex --minimal
# Or initialize in current directory
arckit init . --ai codex
Start Using ArcKit
# GitHub Copilot (VS Code)
cd payment-modernization && code .
# In Copilot Chat, use ArcKit commands:
/arckit-principles Create principles for a financial services company
/arckit-requirements Build a payment processing system...
# Codex CLI
cd payment-modernization
codex
# Inside your AI assistant, use ArcKit commands:
/arckit:principles Create principles for a financial services company
/arckit:requirements Build a payment processing system...
/arckit:sow Generate RFP for vendor selection
# Mistral Vibe CLI
cd payment-modernization
vibe
# Use ArcKit skills:
/arckit-principles Create principles for a financial services company
/arckit-requirements Build a payment processing system...
/arckit-sow Generate RFP for vendor selection
# Or use specialized agents:
vibe --agent arckit-research "Research cloud providers"
# Kimi Code CLI
cd payment-modernization
kimi
# Use ArcKit skills:
/skill:arckit-principles Create principles for a financial services company
/skill:arckit-requirements Build a payment processing system...
/skill:arckit-sow Generate RFP for vendor selection
Upgrading
Claude Code plugin: Updates are automatic via the marketplace — no action needed.
Gemini CLI extension: Updates via gemini extensions update arckit.
GitHub Copilot: Re-run arckit init --here --ai copilot to update prompt files, agents, and instructions.
Mistral Vibe: Pull the latest standalone extension repo: cd ~/.vibe/extensions/arckit && git pull.
Kimi Code CLI: Re-run the install command from the kimi prompt to pick up the latest release: /plugins install https://github.com/tractorjuice/arckit-kimi.git.
Codex CLI:
# Step 1: Upgrade the CLI tool
pip install --upgrade git+https://github.com/tractorjuice/arc-kit.git
# Or with uv:
uv tool install --force arckit-cli --from git+https://github.com/tractorjuice/arc-kit.git
# Step 2: Update your existing project (re-run init in place)
cd /path/to/your-existing-project
arckit init --here --ai codex
This updates commands, templates, scripts, and agents while preserving your project data (projects/) and custom templates (.arckit/templates-custom/).
If upgrading from v0.x, you may also need to migrate legacy filenames — see the upgrading guide for full details.
Explore Example Outputs
Public demonstration repositories showcase complete ArcKit deliverables:
- NHS Appointment Booking — arckit-test-project-v7-nhs-appointment: Digital health platform with NHS Spine integration and GDPR safeguards.
- M365 GCC-H Migration — arckit-test-project-v1-m365: Government cloud migration with compliance mapping and change management.
- HMRC Tax Assistant — arckit-test-project-v2-hmrc-chatbot: Conversational AI service covering PII protection and bilingual support.
- Windows 11 Deployment — arckit-test-project-v3-windows11: Enterprise OS rollout with policy migration and security baselines.
- Patent Application System — arckit-test-project-v6-patent-system: Intellectual property workflow automation using GOV.UK Pay and Notify.
- ONS Data Platform — arckit-test-project-v8-ons-data-platform: Official statistics analytics environment with Five Safes governance.
- Cabinet Office GenAI Platform — arckit-test-project-v9-cabinet-office-genai: Cross-government GenAI platform with responsible AI guardrails.
- UK Government Training Marketplace — arckit-test-project-v10-training-marketplace: AI training procurement platform with multi-sided marketplace design.
- National Highways Data Architecture — arckit-test-project-v11-national-highways-data: Strategic road network data platform modernization.
- Scottish Courts GenAI — arckit-test-project-v14-scottish-courts: Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service GenAI strategy with comprehensive MLOps and FinOps.
- Doctors Appointment System — arckit-test-project-v16-doctors-appointment: Online appointment booking system with NHS integration.
- UK Fuel Price Transparency — arckit-test-project-v17-fuel-prices: UK Government fuel price transparency service with real-time pricing data.
- Smart Meter Consumer App — arckit-test-project-v18-smart-meter: UK Smart Meter data consumer mobile app with DCC/SMIP integration.
- UK Government API Aggregator — arckit-test-project-v19-gov-api-aggregator: Unified access to 240+ UK Government APIs across 34+ departments.
What it costs (plugin footprint)
Token cost of installing the arckit core plugin in a Claude Code session, captured from claude plugin details arckit on v2.1.143+:
- Always-on per session: ~10,042 tokens — added to every session's system context, covering the 73 command-skills + 5 utility skills (
architecture-workflow,arckit-build,mermaid-syntax,plantuml-syntax,wardley-mapping) + 29 agent descriptors. Hooks (9 events) and MCP servers (6) are harness-resolved at runtime and not counted. - On-invoke: ~250 to ~60K tokens per command — paid only when a specific skill or agent fires. Most commands are in the 5–10K range.
On-invoke cost by command
Costs are estimates from the Claude Code tokenizer and may differ from actual usage. Use this table to budget research-heavy multi-command sessions.
Trimming the footprint
- The five utility skills already use
paths:globs to scope their always-on cost to relevant projects (mermaid-syntaxonly loads under*.mmd,wardley-mappingunder WARD artefacts, etc.). The 73 command-skills are listed but not described in detail in the always-on context — the full prompt only loads on invocation. - Community overlays (
arckit-uae,arckit-fr,arckit-nl,arckit-ca,arckit-eu,arckit-at,arckit-au,arckit-au-energy,arckit-us,arckit-uk-finance,arckit-uk-nhs) are independent plugins — install only the jurisdictions / sectors you need. Each adds its own always-on baseline.arckit-uk-finance,arckit-uk-nhs, andarckit-au-energyare sector overlays (arckit-au-energylayers the energy sector on thearckit-aujurisdiction baseline); the rest are jurisdiction-based. - Heavy commands (
jsp-936,analyze,diagram,backlog) are on-invoke only; the always-on cost is unaffected by which heavy commands exist.
To measure your own session footprint, run /context all (Claude Code v2.1.139+) for per-skill token estimates against your active model.
Why ArcKit?
Problem: Architecture Governance is Broken
Traditional enterprise architecture suffers from:
- ❌ Scattered documents across tools (Word, Confluence, PowerPoint)
- ❌ Inconsistent governance enforcement
- ❌ Manual vendor evaluation with bias
- ❌ Lost traceability between requirements and design
- ❌ Stale documentation that doesn't match reality
Solution: Structured, AI-Assisted Governance
ArcKit provides:
- ✅ Template-Driven Quality: Comprehensive templates ensure nothing is forgotten
- ✅ Systematic Workflows: Clear processes from requirements → procurement → design review
- ✅ AI Assistance: Let AI handle document generation, you focus on decisions
- ✅ Enforced Traceability: Automatic gap detection and coverage analysis
- ✅ Version Control: Git-based workflow for all architecture artifacts
What ArcKit does not do
ArcKit generates DRAFT artefacts for qualified people to review. It is not legal, regulatory, clinical, or security advice, and no output it produces is a submission, a certification, an accreditation, or a compliance decision. Every artefact carries Status: DRAFT until a named accountable person signs it off, and that is the point at which responsibility for the content transfers to your organisation.
Concretely, and regardless of how complete an artefact looks:
- A
/arckit:dpiaoutput is not a completed DPIA. UK GDPR Article 35 places the assessment on the controller, and Article 36 requires prior consultation with the ICO where high residual risk remains. ArcKit drafts the document. The controller and the Data Protection Officer own it, and only they can conclude it. /arckit:secureand/arckit:mod-securedo not produce an assurance decision. NCSC CAF outcomes, Cyber Essentials certification, and MOD Secure by Design assurance are all judged by named accountable individuals and, where relevant, by certification bodies. A generated assessment is input to that judgement, never a substitute for it./arckit:atrsand/arckit:ai-playbookdo not make an algorithmic tool lawful, fair, or transparent. An ATRS record is published by the department after its own internal clearance, and the UK Government AI Playbook principles are obligations on the deploying organisation.- The EU overlay does not perform conformity assessment. It drafts documentation referencing the AI Act, NIS2, DORA, CRA, DSA and the Data Act. It is not a notified-body activity, it does not determine your risk classification, and it does not track amendments or implementing acts as they are made.
/arckit:jsp-936and the NHS clinical safety commands are not assurance either. Defence AI assurance requires the accountable authority; DCB0129 and DCB0160 require a suitably registered Clinical Safety Officer.- No output is a procurement decision. Research, scoring, and evaluation commands rank options against stated criteria. The Senior Responsible Owner and the procurement officer decide, under whatever framework rules apply to them.
Two limits apply to everything above:
- Citations reflect the moment they were fetched. Commands cite sources at fetch time and record the URL, but legislation, standards, framework agreements, and vendor pricing all change. A citation that resolved when the artefact was generated may not describe the current text.
- Generated content can be wrong. Output is produced by a language model, and research commands extract from third-party web pages that may themselves be inaccurate or written to mislead. ArcKit isolates that extraction behind schema validation and keeps scoring deterministic, which reduces the blast radius but does not make the underlying facts true.
Who must review what
Before any ArcKit artefact is relied on, published, or submitted:
- Data protection artefacts (DPIA, records of processing): Data Protection Officer
- Security and assurance artefacts: CISO, or the assessing authority for the relevant regime
- Clinical safety artefacts: a registered Clinical Safety Officer
- Business cases and procurement artefacts: Senior Responsible Owner and procurement or commercial lead
- Anything referencing a regulation, in any jurisdiction: qualified legal counsel for that jurisdiction
The community overlays each carry their own, narrower version of this warning. This section applies to all of ArcKit, including the officially-maintained core commands.
UK Government Compliance
ArcKit includes dedicated commands for UK public sector delivery:
/arckit:tcop— Assess all 13 Technology Code of Practice points across delivery phases./arckit:ai-playbook— Produce responsible AI assessments aligned to the UK Government AI Playbook and ATRS./arckit:secure— Generate Secure by Design artefacts covering NCSC CAF, Cyber Essentials, and UK GDPR controls./arckit:mod-secure— Map MOD Secure by Design requirements (JSP 440, IAMM, clearance pathways)./arckit:jsp-936— Deliver JSP 936 AI assurance packs for defence AI systems.
See the demo repositories for end-to-end examples, especially arckit-test-project-v7-nhs-appointment (civilian services) and arckit-test-project-v9-cabinet-office-genai (AI governance).
EU, French, Dutch & Austrian Regulatory Compliance (Community)
⚠️ Community-contributed. EU and French commands are domain-maintained by @thomas-jardinet, Austrian commands by @gtonic. The 27 commands below cover EU regulations (GDPR, NIS2, AI Act, DORA, CRA, DSA, Data Act, Cloud Sovereignty Framework), French government standards (SecNumCloud, ANSSI, EBIOS, CNIL, DINUM, etc.), Dutch government standards (Rijksbreed cloudbeleid, VIRBI 2025, BIO2, cloud exit), and Austrian government standards (DSG, NISG 2026, BVergG 2018, BaFG / WZG accessibility). They are not part of the officially-maintained baseline — output should be reviewed by qualified DPO / CISO / Vergabejurist / legal counsel before reliance, and citations may lag current source text. Each command surfaces with a
[COMMUNITY]prefix in/helplistings and renders a warning banner before generating.
EU regulations (member-state-neutral baselines, applicable across EU/EEA):
/arckit:eu-rgpd— GDPR (EU 2016/679) compliance assessment — legal basis, data subject rights, transfers, DPIA screening, breach notification/arckit:eu-nis2— NIS2 Directive — operators of essential / important entities, Article 21 measures, incident reporting timelines/arckit:eu-ai-act— EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) — risk classification (prohibited / high-risk / GPAI), conformity routes/arckit:eu-dora— Digital Operational Resilience Act (EU 2022/2554) — financial sector ICT risk, TLPT, third-party register/arckit:eu-cra— Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation 2024/2847) — products with digital elements, SBOM, VDP, CE marking/arckit:eu-cloud-sovereignty— EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework (v1.2.1, June 2026 calculator weights) — eight weighted sovereignty objectives, SEAL-0 to SEAL-4 assurance levels, minimum-SEAL tender gate/arckit:eu-dsa— Digital Services Act (Regulation 2022/2065) — intermediaries, platforms, VLOPs, ARCOM/arckit:eu-data-act— Data Act (Regulation 2023/2854) — connected products, B2B FRAND, cloud switching, Article 32 international governmental access
French government (apply on top of the EU baseline for French deployments):
/arckit:fr-secnumcloud— SecNumCloud 3.2 qualification (sovereign cloud, OIV/OSE, extraterritorial risk)/arckit:fr-dinum— DINUM standards: RGI, RGAA, RGESN, RGS, doctrine cloud de l'État, FranceConnect, DSFR/arckit:fr-marche-public— French public procurement (code de la commande publique, UGAP, sovereignty clauses)/arckit:fr-rgpd— CNIL-specific GDPR layer (cookies Délibération 2020-091, HDS, age 15, DPO registration)/arckit:fr-ebios— EBIOS Risk Manager — 5-workshop study (VM/ER/SR/CO/SS/SO/MS IDs, MITRE ATT&CK, homologation)/arckit:fr-anssi— ANSSI Guide d'hygiène informatique (42 measures) + cloud security recommendations/arckit:fr-anssi-carto— ANSSI SI cartography across business / application / system / network levels/arckit:fr-dr— Diffusion Restreinte handling under II 901 / SGDSN / ANSSI/arckit:fr-algorithme-public— Public algorithm transparency notice (Article L311-3-1 CRPA, Loi République Numérique)/arckit:fr-pssi— Information System Security Policy (PSSI) per ANSSI / RGS/arckit:fr-code-reuse— Public code reuse assessment (code.gouv.fr, SILL, EUPL) — build-vs-reuse decision matrix
Dutch government (apply on top of the EU baseline for Netherlands central-government deployments — domain-maintained by @umag):
/arckit:nl-cloud— Rijksbreed cloudbeleid 2026 compliance (materieel cloudgebruik, exit plan, CISO Rijk notification, EEA residency, staatsgeheim / TBB eligibility)/arckit:nl-tbb— Te Beschermen Belangen (TBB) category determination (BIV scoring across five kernbelangen; any existing VIRBI 2025 rubricering is applied as a floor on the category, never derived from it)/arckit:nl-bio— BIO2 conformance (OBDO, on NEN-EN-ISO/IEC 27001:2023 and 27002:2022)/arckit:nl-exit— Cloud exit plan under Rijksbreed cloudbeleid clause 3.2 (planned exit and disruptive interruption, annual review)
Austrian government (apply on top of the EU baseline for Austrian deployments — domain-maintained by @gtonic):
/arckit:at-dsgvo— Austrian DSG layer on GDPR (image processing on the GDPR per the VwGH's §12 DSG ruling, ELGA/GTelG health, §96a ArbVG employee monitoring, age 14 consent, DSB enforcement)/arckit:at-nisg— Austrian NISG 2026 (NIS2 transposition, BGBl. I Nr. 94/2025, in force since 1 Oct 2026) — Essential/Important designation, Cybersicherheitsbehörde registration, CSIRT reporting (CERT.at / GovCERT / HealthCERT), KSÖ, sectoral overlaps (DORA, equivalent sector acts)/arckit:at-bvergg— Bundesvergabegesetz 2018 procurement — Oberschwellen/Unterschwellen, ANKÖ publication, Bestbieterprinzip, BVwG review/arckit:at-barrierefreiheit— Digital accessibility across both transposition tracks — BaFG (European Accessibility Act, private sector) and WZG (public sector), EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA, Barrierefreiheitserklärung, SMS and FFG
These layer cleanly on the existing baseline — fr-rgpd / at-dsgvo extend eu-rgpd, fr-pssi / at-nisg reference eu-nis2, and fr-secnumcloud integrates with arckit.research and arckit.evaluate for procurement workflows. Austrian commands carry [NEEDS VERIFICATION] markers where a point is genuinely open rather than unreviewed — further implementing ordinances under the NISG 2026, the applicable Land accessibility laws, current guidance versions, and recent DSB case law. nl-cloud and nl-tbb play the same role for Dutch deployments, with nl-cloud keying its public-cloud eligibility off the TBB category determined by nl-tbb.
Canada Federal Overlay (12 commands)
Federal Canadian regulatory baseline as a [COMMUNITY] overlay — covering FITAA (Bill C-70 2024), federal privacy and access (Privacy Act, ATI Act), Treasury Board Directive on Automated Decision-Making, Charter rights design review, ITSG-33 + Standard on Security Categorization, Security of Information Act handling, GC Cloud sovereign residency, GC Digital Standards conformance, Official Languages Act, federal procurement (PSPC + PSIB), and First Nations OCAP® data sovereignty.
Help wanted: looking for a Canadian federal enterprise architect to co-maintain this overlay. Open an issue or DM @tractorjuice.
UAE Federal Overlay (Community-contributed)
⚠️ Community-contributed overlay. The 12 commands below cover UAE federal regulatory and digital-government instruments and ship as a community-contributed overlay (not part of the officially-maintained baseline of 68). They are anchored on the UAE Cabinet decree of 23 April 2026 mandating that 50% of federal services run on agentic AI by April 2028, and on the federal data, identity, AI governance, and procurement frameworks the decree references. The overlay is currently solo-maintained by @tractorjuice; a UAE domain co-maintainer is being recruited before the overlay can be re-evaluated for official-baseline promotion. Six citations are flagged
[NEEDS VERIFICATION]pending Executive Regulations and authority confirmations — seedocs/guides/uae-overlay-maintenance.md. Output should be reviewed by qualified UAE federal compliance counsel before reliance.
Set governance_framework: UAE Federal and classification_scheme: UAE Smart Data in plugin userConfig to switch the Document Control header into UAE Smart Data classification rendering across every artefact.
Federal data and security:
/arckit:uae-classification— UAE Smart Data Classification Register (Open / Confidential / Sensitive / Secret, the four Smart Data Framework classes) with handling rules and declassification schedule/arckit:uae-pdpl— Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 (PDPL) compliance assessment — DPIA, lawful-basis register, data-subject-rights procedure, cross-border transfer log/arckit:uae-ias— UAE Cybersecurity Council Information Assurance Standard v2 — Statement of Applicability against 188 controls (60 management M1–M6, 128 technical T1–T9), priority-tiered P1–P4/arckit:uae-cloud-residency— National Cloud Security Policy v2 sovereign cloud assessment — per-classification residency, candidate CSPs (Core42 / G42, Microsoft UAE North/Central, TDRA FedNet, e& Sovereign Launchpad on AWS) checked against the policy's tiers and minimum certifications, shared-responsibility matrix, exit/portability plan
Federal identity:
/arckit:uae-uaepass— UAE Pass integration design (OIDC/OAuth flow, claim mapping, Basic vs Verified profile selection, Service Provider onboarding, e-signature audit trail)
Cabinet instruments:
/arckit:uae-zero-bureaucracy— Service Catalogue review under the UAE Code for Government Services and Zero Bureaucracy programme/arckit:uae-digital-records— Digital Records Plan under the UAE Government Services Digital Records Policy (source-of-truth register per service, retention schedule, official-source designation)/arckit:uae-data-sharing— Data Sharing Agreement under the UAE Government Services Data Sharing Policy ("collect once, use securely") with PDPL lawful basis per share/arckit:uae-priorities-alignment— National Priorities Alignment Statement under the UAE Federal Government Guide — reuse-vs-build, capability-reuse register (UAE Pass, FedNet), strategy alignment to NIS 2031 / AI 2031 / We the UAE 2031
AI governance:
/arckit:uae-ai-charter— UAE Charter for the Development and Use of AI compliance assessment (12 principles)/arckit:uae-ai-autonomy-tier— Three-tier AI autonomy posture (Tier 1 internal-productivity, Tier 2 investor-facing-with-approval, Tier 3 regulated/financial) with per-tier guard-rails, approval gates, audit obligations, tier-promotion criteria
Procurement:
/arckit:uae-procurement— Federal procurement strategy under Federal Decree-Law No. 11 of 2023 — ITT/RFP packs against MoF Digital Procurement Platform templates, In-Country Value (ICV) plan, evaluation report structure, contract register
The commands chain together in a canonical order from principles → uae-classification → uae-pdpl → uae-ias → uae-cloud-residency → uae-uaepass → uae-zero-bureaucracy → uae-digital-records → uae-data-sharing → uae-ai-charter → uae-ai-autonomy-tier → uae-priorities-alignment → uae-procurement → sobc → wardley → framework. Full guide: docs/guides/uae-overlay.md.
UK NHS Clinical Safety Overlay (Community-contributed)
⚠️ Community-contributed overlay — second sector-specific overlay in ArcKit, after
arckit-uk-finance. The 4 commands below cover NHS clinical safety (DCB0129 manufacturer + DCB0160 deployer), NHS DTAC procurement assurance, and UK MDR 2002 + EU MDR 2017/745 software-as-medical-device classification. Adopts Dr Marcus Baw's SAFETY.md spec for DCB0129/0160 file naming and YAML-frontmatter hazard log. Output is not clinical, legal, or regulatory advice — MUST be reviewed by a qualified Clinical Safety Officer (CSO with appropriate GMC / NMC / HCPC / GPhC registration) and, for MDR classification, by a qualified Regulatory Affairs specialist before reliance.
Clinical safety (DCB0129 + DCB0160):
/arckit:uk-nhs-dcb0129— NHS DCB0129 manufacturer Clinical Safety Case + Hazard Log. Produces a 3-file set inprojects/{NNN}/clinical-safety/:SAFETY.md(front-door anchor),SAFETY-CASE.md(GSN-inspired safety argument),HAZARD-LOG.md(YAML-frontmatter hazard array + rendered Markdown table; 6 starter hazards covering wrong-patient, stale data, audit, authorisation, alert delivery, write integrity)/arckit:uk-nhs-dcb0160— NHS DCB0160 deployer Clinical Safety Case + Deployment Hazard Log. Produces a 3-file deployer-side set inprojects/{NNN}/clinical-safety/deployment/; 10 starter deployment hazards covering training, workflow integration, BC, parallel running, migration, local configuration, terminology, RBAC, incident reporting
Procurement and regulation:
/arckit:uk-nhs-dtac— NHS Digital Technology Assessment Criteria, following the DTAC form version 2.0 (24 February 2026; required from 6 April 2026): context sections A and B, assessed sections C1–C4 (Clinical safety, Data protection, Technical security, Interoperability) and scored section D1 (Usability and accessibility), plus an optional AI supplement outside DTAC. Cross-references DCB0129, MDR classification, DPIA, ATRS, Secure by Design/arckit:uk-mdr-classification— UK MDR 2002 (as amended) + EU MDR 2017/745 software-as-medical-device (SaMD) and AI-as-medical-device (AIaMD) classification. UKCA / UKNI / CE marking pathway, Windsor Framework NI handling, conformity-assessment route, MHRA SaMD/AIaMD Programme alignment, ISO 14971 / IEC 62304 / ISO 13485 standards mapping, post-market obligations
The commands compose with — not replace — the UK government baseline (tcop, secure, dpia, atrs, risk, service-assessment). Recipe: uk-nhs-clinical-safety (44 targets across the clinical-safety waves). Proposed domain co-maintainer: Dr Marcus Baw (@pacharanero) — clinical informatician at RCPCH, openEHR, NHS England.
The DCB0129/0160 outputs deliberately do not carry the ARC- prefix — they follow Marcus's SAFETY.md spec convention so they remain readable by clinicians, MHRA reviewers, and procurement teams who do not use ArcKit. Other artefacts cross-reference them by relative path. Full design log (as committed in #501): docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-19-uk-nhs-overlay-design.md.
USA Federal Civilian Overlay (10 commands)
⚠️ Community-contributed overlay. The 10 commands below cover US federal civilian compliance instruments (FedRAMP authorization, FISMA / NIST 800-53 Rev 5, CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model, OMB M-19-17 ICAM, NIST AI RMF + OMB M-25-21/M-25-22 AI assurance, E-Government Act §208 PIA, EO 14028 SBOM self-attestation). They ship as the arckit-us community-contributed overlay (not part of the officially-maintained baseline of 72). EO 14110 was revoked January 2025; the live AI mandates are OMB M-25-21 (use of AI; it rescinded and replaced M-24-10 on 3 April 2025) + M-25-22 (acquisition of AI; it replaced M-24-18). FedRAMP completed the Rev 5 transition in 2024. The overlay is currently solo-maintained by @tractorjuice; a US federal-civilian domain co-maintainer is being recruited (CISO / SAOP / FedRAMP PMO / CAIO backgrounds welcome) before the overlay can be re-evaluated for official-baseline promotion. Output should be reviewed by qualified US federal counsel before reliance.
In scope (v1): federal civilian agencies and the vendors that sell to them.
Out of scope (sibling overlays for the future): federal defense (CMMC / RMF / DISA STIGs), state regimes (StateRAMP / TX-RAMP / CJIS / IRS Pub 1075 / CCPA), sector-specific (HIPAA / GLBA / SOX / FERPA / PCI DSS), Section 508 accessibility (deferred to v5.2).
Recipe: us-federal (5 waves — baseline → controls → posture → ai → authorization).
Install: claude plugin install arckit arckit-us. See docs/guides/us-federal-overlay.md for the USA Federal Civilian overlay maintenance guide and citation register.
UK Finance Payments Overlay (4 commands) — First Sector Overlay
EXPERIMENTAL sector overlay. The 4 commands below cover established UK Payment Service Providers, E-Money Institutions and Payment Institutions working under an FCA authorisation: SCA-RTS exemption design, safeguarding under the EMRs 2011, PSRs 2017 and CASS 15, the FCA Consumer Duty board report, and Critical Third Parties dependencies. They ship as the arckit-uk-finance community-contributed overlay — the first sector-specific overlay (distinct from the 8 jurisdictional overlays). Output requires review by qualified UK FS regulatory counsel, MLRO, and the firm's accountable senior managers (SMF holders only where the firm is within SM&CR) before implementation.
Payments architecture and compliance:
/arckit:uk-fs-sca-rts— SCA-RTS exemption design: the ten exemptions in UK SCA-RTS Articles 10 to 18 (FCA technical standards under PSRs 2017 regulation 106A), TRA reference fraud rates and the Article 20 cessation rule, fraud monitoring (FSSCA)/arckit:uk-fs-safeguarding— EMI / PI safeguarding assessment under EMRs 2011 regulations 20 to 22, PSRs 2017 regulation 23 and CASS 15 (from 7 May 2026), including the monthly safeguarding return; CRITICAL severity (FSSAFE)/arckit:uk-fs-consumer-duty— FCA Consumer Duty annual board report under Principle 12 and PRIN 2A (FSCD)/arckit:uk-fs-ctp-dependency— Critical Third Parties dependency register and resilience testing plan under PS24/16 and FSMA 2023 (FSCTP)
Recipe: uk-fs-payments (11 targets across baseline and overlay commands).
Install: claude plugin install arckit arckit-uk-finance. Help wanted: recruiting a UK financial services domain co-maintainer (CISO / Compliance / Head of Architecture background welcome) to transition to official-baseline status.
UK G-Cloud Supplier Bid-Authoring Overlay (15 commands) — Proprietary
PROPRIETARY, Claude Code only. The 15 commands below are a supplier-side overlay for authoring UK G-Cloud 15 (RM1557.15) Digital Marketplace bids, run by the Government Commercial Agency (GCA, formerly CCS): supplier profile, social value, lot questions, the Procurement Act 2023 supplier declaration, service design, a Service Definition Document for each of the five lots (1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3), pricing, security evidence, competitor benchmarking, submission review, and a final submission pack. Unlike every other ArcKit plugin,
arckit-uk-gcloudships under a proprietary licence (not MIT) and is not distributed to the non-Claude extension formats (Codex / Gemini / OpenCode / Copilot) — it runs on Claude Code only. It is the 4th sector-specific overlay (afterarckit-uk-finance,arckit-uk-nhs,arckit-au-energy) and requires thearckitcore plugin.
Supplier-wide (once per bid):
/arckit:supplier-profile— Supplier profile: company, CDP and PPON, contacts, certifications, insurance (SUPP)/arckit:social-value— Social value commitments, Social Value Contact and operational readiness, 10% pass/fail on every lot (SOCV)/arckit:lot-questions— Lot questions per lot group: conditions of participation, scored Lot 1a/1b quality answers, Lot 2 and Lot 3 mandatory award criteria (LOTQ)/arckit:declaration— Procurement Act 2023 supplier declaration (DECL)
Per service:
/arckit:service-design— Service design, lot choice and value proposition (SVCD)/arckit:sdd-lot1a— Service Definition Document, Lot 1a IaaS and PaaS (SDD)/arckit:sdd-lot1b— Service Definition Document, Lot 1b IaaS and PaaS above OFFICIAL (SDD)/arckit:sdd-lot2a— Service Definition Document, Lot 2a Infrastructure Software as a Service (SDD)/arckit:sdd-lot2b— Service Definition Document, Lot 2b Software as a Service (SDD)/arckit:sdd-lot3— Service Definition Document, Lot 3 Cloud Support, with the DDaT role levels that deliver it (SDD)/arckit:pricing— Pricing by lot: 1a/1b price formula, 2a/2b discount bands; for Lot 3, the supplier's one DDaT rate card, shared by every Lot 3 service (PRIC, RATE)/arckit:security— Security evidence: certifications by lot and the NCSC Cloud Security Principles (SECA)/arckit:gcloud-competitors— G-Cloud competitor benchmark (GCMP)/arckit:review— G-Cloud submission review and gap analysis (GCRV)/arckit:submission-pack— Assemble the final G-Cloud submission pack
Recommended order: supplier-profile → social-value → service-design → the lot's SDD command → pricing and security → lot-questions → declaration → review → submission-pack. The lot questions come after the SDDs because their award criteria repeat each service's answers.
Skills: gcloud-framework (G-Cloud 15 question set, limits and evaluation), cloud-security, ddat-rate-card (Lot 3 job families, roles and levels; replaces sfia-skills). Recipe: uk-gcloud-submission (end-to-end bid assembly). G-Cloud 14 is no longer supported: /arckit:sdd-lot1 is replaced by sdd-lot1a and sdd-lot1b, and /arckit:sdd-lot2 by sdd-lot2a and sdd-lot2b.
Install: claude plugin install arckit arckit-uk-gcloud. Proprietary — see the licence-exception note at the foot of this README. Ported from the standalone gcloud-kit plugin.
TOGAF ADM Overlay (arckit-togaf-adm) [COMMUNITY]
Enterprise Architecture Development Method — 9 commands covering the full ADM cycle.
Install: claude plugin install arckit arckit-togaf-adm
Recipe: togaf-adm-full — full ADM cycle via build recipe
O-AA Overlay (arckit-oaa) [COMMUNITY]
Open Agile Architecture (O-AA Standard, Version 2.0, C262) — agile enterprise architecture for product-driven, sprint-based delivery. A standalone overlay alongside arckit-togaf-adm; the two are complementary, not competitors — see the O-AA vs TOGAF ADM decision guide.
Handoff chain: oaa-adm-lite → product-architecture → agile-strategy → agile-security → agile-governance.
Install: claude plugin install arckit arckit-oaa
Recipe: oaa-full — ADM Lite → product → strategy → security → governance
Using TOGAF ADM and O-AA Together
The two overlays are complementary, not competitors. Each depends only on the arckit core (=6.18.3 pin) — neither depends on the other. O-AA maps the ADM cycle onto sprints within a 4–8 week engagement; arckit-togaf-adm keeps the full document-centric ADM. Decision guide: O-AA vs TOGAF ADM.
Install for pattern A (one plugin per CLI invocation; community plugins install disabled):
claude plugin install arckit
claude plugin install arckit-togaf-adm && claude plugin enable arckit-togaf-adm
claude plugin install arckit-oaa && claude plugin enable arckit-oaa
Running both in the same project:
- No collisions: separate namespaces (
/arckit-togaf-adm:vs/arckit-oaa:) and doc-type codes; one core install satisfies both=6.18.3pins. - No schema files are shared between the overlays. The O-AA YAML sprint artefacts are defined in the O-AA templates and kept consistent with the matching TOGAF documents:
vision.yamlwith the ADM Preliminary, whichoaa-adm-litereads, andimplementation-strategy.yamlwith the transition architecture.oaa-adm-litesends Sprint 4+ architecture change requests through/arckit-togaf-adm:architecture-change.agile-governancedefines its ownchange-request.yamlandcompliance-evidence.yaml(the latter shared withagile-security) and does not readarchitecture-changeoutput. - Order: run the TOGAF baseline first, then let O-AA sprints execute it at sprint velocity. O-AA commands read TOGAF outputs when they exist (ADM Preliminary, business capability map, transition architecture) but do not require them, so the reverse order works mechanically — you just lose the "sprints execute the baseline" benefit.
AI Agent Architecture Overlay (arckit-agent-architecture) [COMMUNITY]
Governance, design, and security for autonomous AI agent programs — 6 commands.
Install: claude plugin install arckit arckit-agent-architecture
Recipe: agent-architecture — full agent architecture lifecycle via build recipe
Combined Recipe: togaf-agent-full
For organisations adopting both enterprise architecture and AI agent governance:
claude agent recipes/togaf-agent-full.yaml
The ArcKit Workflow
ArcKit guides you through the enterprise architecture lifecycle:
Phase 0: Project Planning
/arckit:plan → Create project plan with timeline, phases, and gates
Visualize your entire project delivery:
- GDS Agile Delivery phases (Discovery → Alpha → Beta → Live)
- Mermaid Gantt chart with timeline, dependencies, and milestones
- Workflow diagram showing gates and decision points
- Tailored timeline based on project complexity
- Integration of all ArcKit commands into schedule
- Gate approval criteria for governance
Phase 1: Establish Governance
/arckit:principles → Create enterprise architecture principles
Define your organisation's architecture standards:
- Cloud strategy (AWS/Azure/GCP)
- Security frameworks (Zero Trust, compliance)
- Technology standards
- FinOps and cost governance
Phase 2: Stakeholder Analysis
/arckit:stakeholders → Analyze stakeholder drivers, goals, and outcomes
Do this BEFORE business case to understand who cares about the project and why:
- Identify all stakeholders (internal and external)
- Document underlying drivers (strategic, operational, financial, compliance, risk, personal)
- Map drivers to SMART goals
- Map goals to measurable outcomes
- Create Stakeholder → Driver → Goal → Outcome traceability
- Identify conflicts and synergies
- Define engagement and communication strategies
Phase 3: Risk Assessment
/arckit:risk → Create comprehensive risk register (Orange Book)
Do this BEFORE business case to identify and assess risks systematically:
- Follow HM Treasury Orange Book 2023 framework
- Identify risks across 6 categories (Strategic, Operational, Financial, Compliance, Reputational, Technology)
- Assess inherent risk (before controls) and residual risk (after controls)
- Apply 4Ts response framework (Tolerate, Treat, Transfer, Terminate)
- Link every risk to stakeholder from RACI matrix
- Monitor risk appetite compliance
- Feed into SOBC Management Case Part E
Phase 4: Business Case Justification
/arckit:sobc → Create Strategic Outline Business Case (SOBC)
Do this BEFORE requirements to justify investment and secure approval:
- Use HM Treasury Green Book 5-case model (Strategic, Economic, Commercial, Financial, Management)
- Analyze strategic options (Do Nothing, Minimal, Balanced, Comprehensive)
- Map benefits to stakeholder goals (complete traceability)
- Provide high-level cost estimates (Rough Order of Magnitude)
- Economic appraisal (ROI range, payback period)
- Procurement and funding strategy
- Governance and risk management (uses risk register)
- Enable go/no-go decision BEFORE detailed requirements work
Phase 5: Define Requirements
/arckit:requirements → Document comprehensive requirements
Create detailed requirements informed by stakeholder goals (if SOBC approved):
- Business requirements with rationale
- Functional requirements with acceptance criteria
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability, compliance)
- Integration requirements (upstream/downstream systems)
- Data requirements (DR-xxx)
- Success criteria and KPIs
Phase 5.3: Platform Strategy Design (Optional - for Multi-Sided Platforms)
/arckit:platform-design → Design multi-sided platform strategy using Platform Design Toolkit
Use this phase when designing ecosystem-based platforms (Government as a Platform, marketplaces, data platforms):
- Ecosystem Canvas: Map supply side, demand side, supporting entities with relationship diagrams
- Entity-Role Portraits: Deep dive into 3-5 key entities (context, pressures, goals, gains)
- Motivations Matrix: Identify synergies and conflicts across entities with mitigation strategies
- Transactions Board: Design 10-20 transactions with cost reduction analysis (search, information, negotiation, coordination, enforcement)
- Learning Engine Canvas: 5+ services that help participants improve (data, feedback loops, network effects)
- Platform Experience Canvas: Journey maps with business model and unit economics
- MVP Canvas: Liquidity bootstrapping strategy to solve chicken-and-egg problem
- Platform Design Canvas: Synthesize all 8 canvases into cohesive platform strategy
- UK Government Context: Aligns with Government as a Platform (GaaP), TCoP Point 8 (share/reuse), Digital Marketplace
Use Cases: NHS appointment booking, local authority data marketplaces, training procurement platforms, citizen services portals
Phase 5.5: Data Modeling
/arckit:data-model → Create comprehensive data model with ERD
Create data model based on Data Requirements (DR-xxx):
- Visual Entity-Relationship Diagram (ERD) using Mermaid
- Detailed entity catalog with attributes, types, validation rules
- PII identification and GDPR/DPA 2018 compliance
- Data governance matrix (business owners, stewards, custodians)
- CRUD matrix showing component access patterns
- Data integration mapping (upstream sources, downstream consumers)
- Data quality framework with measurable metrics
- Requirements traceability (DR-xxx → Entity → Attribute)
Phase 5.7: Data Protection Impact Assessment
/arckit:dpia → Generate DPIA for UK GDPR Article 35 compliance
MANDATORY for high-risk processing - assess privacy risks before technology selection:
- ICO 9-criteria automated screening (sensitive data, large scale, vulnerable subjects, AI/ML, etc.)
- Auto-populated from data model (entities, PII, special category data, lawful basis)
- Risk assessment focused on impact on individuals (privacy harm, discrimination)
- Data subject rights implementation checklist (SAR, deletion, portability)
- Children's data assessment (age verification, parental consent)
- AI/ML algorithmic processing assessment (bias, explainability, human oversight)
- ICO prior consultation flagging for high residual risks
- International transfer safeguards (SCCs, BCRs, adequacy decisions)
- Bidirectional links to risk register (DPIA-xxx risk IDs)
- Links mitigations to Secure by Design security controls
Phase 5.8: Data Source Discovery
/arckit:datascout → Discover external data sources
Discover and evaluate external data sources to fulfil project data requirements:
- Data needs extraction from DR/FR/INT/NFR requirements
- UK Government open data portals (data.gov.uk, ONS, NHS Digital, Companies House, OS Data Hub)
- Commercial API providers and data marketplaces
- Free/freemium APIs and open source datasets
- Weighted evaluation scoring (Requirements Fit, Data Quality, License & Cost, API Quality, Compliance, Reliability)
- Gap analysis for unmet data needs
- Data model impact assessment (new entities, attributes, sync strategy)
- Requirements traceability (every DR-xxx mapped to a source or flagged as gap)
- TCoP Point 10 compliance (Make Better Use of Data)
Phase 6: Technology Research
/arckit:research → Research technology, services, and products
Research available solutions to meet requirements with build vs buy analysis:
- Dynamic category detection from requirements (authentication, payments, databases, etc.)
- Commercial SaaS options with pricing, reviews, and ratings (WebSearch)
- Open source alternatives with GitHub stats and community maturity
- UK Government GOV.UK platforms (One Login, Pay, Notify, Forms)
- Digital Marketplace suppliers (G-Cloud, DOS)
- Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) comparison (3-year)
- Build vs Buy vs Adopt recommendations
- Vendor shortlisting for deeper evaluation
- Integration with Wardley mapping (evolution positioning)
- Feeds into SOBC Economic Case (cost data, options analysis)
Phase 6.5: Grants & Funding Research
/arckit:grants → Research UK government grants, charitable funding, and accelerator programmes
Identify and evaluate funding opportunities with eligibility scoring:
- UK Innovate UK grants and R&D funding (e.g. Knowledge Transfer Partnerships, SBRI)
- UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) funding calls
- Charitable foundations and philanthropic funding (e.g. National Lottery Heritage Fund, Wellcome Trust)
- Accelerator and incubator programmes (e.g. DCMS, DSIT-backed cohorts)
- EU Horizon Europe successor funding open to UK entities
- Eligibility scoring matrix against project requirements and stakeholder profile
- Application timeline, deadlines, and award values
- Strategic fit assessment (alignment with project goals and public sector context)
- Outputs a structured GRNT funding opportunity register
Phase 7: Strategic Planning with Wardley Mapping
/arckit:wardley → Create strategic Wardley Maps
Visualize strategic positioning with:
- Component evolution analysis (Genesis → Custom → Product → Commodity)
- Build vs Buy decision framework
- Vendor comparison and procurement strategy
- UK Government Digital Marketplace mapping
- Evolution predictions and strategic gameplay
Phase 7.5: Strategic Roadmap
/arckit:roadmap → Create multi-year architecture roadmap
Create strategic roadmap for multi-year transformation programs:
- Multi-year timeline: 3-5 year roadmap with Mermaid Gantt chart aligned to financial years (FY 2024/25, etc.)
- Strategic themes: Cloud migration, data modernization, security & compliance, DevOps transformation
- Capability evolution: Maturity progression from L1 (Initial) to L5 (Optimized) over time
- Investment planning: CAPEX/OPEX budget by financial year, ROI projections, benefits realization
- Governance framework: ARB monthly, Programme Board monthly, Steering Committee quarterly
- Service Standard gates: Alpha/Beta/Live assessment milestones (UK Government)
- Dependencies: Mermaid flowchart showing initiative sequencing and critical path
- Success metrics: Cloud adoption %, technical debt reduction, deployment frequency, time to market
- Traceability: Links roadmap themes to stakeholder drivers, architecture principles, requirements
- UK Government specifics: Spending Review alignment, TCoP compliance timeline, NCSC CAF progression
Use this when: You have a multi-year transformation program with multiple initiatives running in parallel. Roadmaps are strategic (multi-year, multi-initiative, executive communication) vs project plans which are tactical (single initiative, detailed tasks, team execution).
Roadmap feeds into: /arckit:plan for detailed phase execution, /arckit:sobc for investment business case, /arckit:backlog for prioritized user stories, /arckit:strategy for executive-level synthesis.
Phase 7.6: Architecture Strategy Synthesis
/arckit:strategy → Synthesise strategic artifacts into executive-level Architecture Strategy
Create a comprehensive Architecture Strategy document that synthesises multiple strategic artifacts into a single coherent narrative:
- Strategic vision: 2-3 paragraphs articulating the transformation vision and success definition
- Strategic drivers: Summarised from stakeholder analysis with external drivers (regulatory, market, technology)
- Guiding principles: Key principles with strategic implications, compliance summary
- Current state assessment: Technology landscape, capability maturity baseline (L1-L5), technical debt, SWOT
- Target state vision: Future architecture, capability maturity targets, architecture vision diagram
- Technology evolution: Build vs buy decisions, technology radar (Adopt/Trial/Assess/Hold) from Wardley maps
- Strategic themes: 3-5 investment themes with objectives, initiatives, success criteria, principles alignment
- Delivery roadmap summary: Timeline, phases, milestones from roadmap artifact
- Investment summary: CAPEX/OPEX, NPV, IRR, payback period, benefits realisation from SOBC
- Strategic risks: Top risks with heat map, assumptions, constraints from risk register
- Success metrics: KPIs with baselines and year-over-year targets
- Governance model: Forums, decision rights, review cadence
- Traceability: Driver → Goal → Outcome → Theme → Principle → KPI chain
Use this when: You have multiple strategic artifacts (principles, stakeholders, wardley, roadmap, sobc) and need to create a single executive-level document that synthesises them into a coherent strategy. Ideal for Strategy Board presentations, executive briefings, or stakeholder communication.
Unique requirement: This is the only ArcKit command with TWO mandatory inputs (principles AND stakeholders). Strategy cannot be created without understanding both the decision framework and the stakeholder drivers.
Strategy feeds into: /arckit:requirements for detailed requirements, /arckit:roadmap for expanded timeline, /arckit:plan for project delivery.
Phase 7.7: Architecture Decision Records
/arckit:adr → Document architectural decisions
Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following MADR v4.0 format enhanced with UK Government requirements:
- Decision metadata: Sequential numbering (ADR-001, ADR-002), status (Proposed/Accepted/Superseded), escalation level (Team/Cross-team/Department/Cross-government)
- Stakeholder RACI: Deciders (accountable), Consulted (SMEs, two-way), Informed (one-way communication)
- Context and problem statement: Why this decision is needed, business/technical/regulatory drivers
- Decision drivers: Technical forces (performance, security, scalability), business forces (cost, time), compliance forces (GDS Service Standard, TCoP, NCSC, UK GDPR)
- Options analysis: Minimum 2-3 options plus "Do Nothing" baseline, each with pros/cons, cost (CAPEX/OPEX/TCO), GDS Service Standard impact, Wardley evolution stage
- Y-Statement: Structured justification - "In the context of X, facing Y, we decided for Z to achieve A, accepting B"
- Consequences: Positive (benefits, capabilities), Negative (trade-offs, technical debt), Neutral (training, infrastructure), Risks and mitigations
- Validation: How implementation will be verified (design reviews, code reviews, testing, monitoring)
- Traceability: Links to requirements, principles, stakeholders, research, Wardley maps, diagrams, risk register
- UK Government specifics: Escalation levels (Team → Cross-team → Department → Cross-government), governance forums (ARB, TDA, Programme Board), Service Standard/TCoP compliance documentation
Use this when: Making significant architectural decisions that affect system structure, quality attributes, or behavior - technology choices (databases, frameworks, cloud services), integration patterns, security approaches, deployment strategies, data management.
ADR feeds into: /arckit:diagram (architecture diagrams reflect decisions), /arckit:hld-review and /arckit:dld-review (reviews verify decisions implemented), /arckit:traceability (decisions are key traceability artifacts).
Phase 8: Vendor Procurement (if needed)
/arckit:sow → Generate Statement of Work (RFP)
Create RFP-ready documents with:
- Scope of work and deliverables
- Technical requirements
- Vendor qualifications
- Evaluation criteria
- Contract terms
/arckit:dos → Digital Outcomes and Specialists (DOS) procurement 🇬🇧
For UK public sector organizations needing custom development:
- Generate DOS-compliant procurement documentation
- Extract requirements from project artifacts (BR/FR/NFR/INT/DR)
- Essential vs desirable skills from requirements
- Success criteria (technology-agnostic)
- Evaluation framework (40% Technical, 30% Team, 20% Quality, 10% Value)
- Audit-ready documentation for Digital Marketplace
/arckit:gcloud-search → G-Cloud service search with live marketplace search 🇬🇧
For UK public sector organizations needing off-the-shelf cloud services:
- Generate G-Cloud requirements document
- Live Digital Marketplace search using WebSearch
- Find actual services with suppliers, prices, features, links
- Service comparison table with recommendations
- Shortlist top 3-5 matching services
- Links to Digital Marketplace guidance (gov.uk)
/arckit:gcloud-clarify → G-Cloud service validation and gap analysis 🇬🇧
Validate G-Cloud services and generate supplier clarification questions:
- Systematic gap analysis (MUST/SHOULD requirements vs service descriptions)
- Detect gaps: ✅ Confirmed, ⚠️ Ambiguous, ❌ Not mentioned
- Generate prioritised questions (🔴 Critical / 🟠 High / 🔵 Medium / 🟢 Low)
- Risk assessment matrix for each service
- Email templates for supplier engagement
- Evidence requirements specification
- Next steps checklist
/arckit:evaluate → Create vendor evaluation framework
Set up systematic scoring:
- Technical evaluation criteria (100 points)
- Cost evaluation methodology
- Reference check templates
- Decision matrix
/arckit:evaluate (compare mode) → Compare vendor proposals
Side-by-side analysis of:
- Technical approaches
- Cost breakdowns
- Risk assessments
- Value propositions
Phase 9: Design Review
/arckit:hld-review → Review High-Level Design
Validate designs against:
- Architecture principles compliance
- Requirements coverage
- Security and compliance
- Scalability and resilience
- Operational readiness
/arckit:dld-review → Review Detailed Design
Implementation-ready validation:
- Component specifications
- API contracts (OpenAPI)
- Database schemas
- Security implementation
- Test strategy
Phase 10: Sprint Planning
/arckit:backlog → Generate prioritised product backlog
Transform requirements into sprint-ready user stories:
- Convert requirements (BR/FR/NFR/INT/DR) to GDS-format user stories
- Multi-factor prioritization (MoSCoW + risk + value + dependencies)
- Organise into sprint plan with capacity balancing
- Generate traceability matrix (requirements → stories → sprints)
- Export to Jira/Azure DevOps (CSV) or custom tools (JSON)
- Time savings: 75%+ (4-6 weeks → 3-5 days)
When to run: After HLD approval, before Sprint 1 (Alpha → Beta transition)
Phase 10.5: Backlog Export
/arckit:trello → Export product backlog to Trello
Push your backlog directly to Trello for sprint execution:
- Create Trello board with sprint-based lists (Product Backlog + per-sprint + In Progress + Done)
- Cards with priority labels, story points, and acceptance criteria checklists
- Colour-coded labels by MoSCoW priority and requirement type
- Rate-limit-aware Trello API integration
- Requires
TRELLO_API_KEYandTRELLO_TOKENenvironment variables
When to run: After /arckit:backlog generates the product backlog (requires JSON export)
Phase 11: ServiceNow Service Management Design
/arckit:servicenow → Generate ServiceNow service design
Bridge architecture to operations:
- CMDB design (derived from architecture diagrams)
- SLA definitions (derived from NFRs)
- Incident management design
- Change management plan
- Monitoring and alerting plan
- Service transition plan
Phase 12: Traceability
/arckit:traceability → Generate traceability matrix
Ensure complete coverage:
- Requirements → Design mapping
- Design → Test mapping
- Gap analysis and orphan detection
- Change impact tracking
Phase 13: Quality Assurance
/arckit:analyze → Comprehensive governance quality analysis
Periodically assess governance quality across all artifacts:
- Architecture principles compliance
- Requirements coverage and traceability
- Stakeholder alignment verification
- Risk management completeness
- Design review quality
- Documentation completeness and quality
- Gap identification and recommendations
When to use: Run periodically (before milestones, design reviews, or procurement decisions) to identify gaps and ensure governance standards are maintained.
Phase 14: Compliance Assessment (UK Government)
For UK Government and public sector projects:
/arckit:service-assessment → GDS Service Standard assessment preparation
Prepare for mandatory GDS Service Standard assessments:
- Analyze evidence against all 14 Service Standard points
- Identify gaps for alpha, beta, or live assessments
- Generate RAG (Red/Amber/Green) ratings and overall readiness score
- Provide actionable recommendations with priorities and timelines
- Include assessment day preparation guidance
- Map ArcKit artifacts to Service Standard evidence requirements
Run at end of Discovery (for alpha prep), mid-Beta (for beta prep), or before Live to ensure readiness.
/arckit:tcop → Technology Code of Practice assessment
Assess compliance with all 13 TCoP points:
- Point 1: Define user needs
- Point 2: Make things accessible
- Point 3: Be open and use open source
- Point 4: Make use of open standards
- Point 5: Use cloud first
- Point 6: Make things secure
- Point 7: Make privacy integral
- Point 8: Share, reuse and collaborate
- Point 9: Integrate and adapt technology
- Point 10: Make better use of data
- Point 11: Define your purchasing strategy
- Point 12: Meet the Digital Spend Controls
- Point 13: Define yo